1. Establish what is being published
A useful submission identifies the game, the developer or content owner, the engine and build version, and the intended platform. It should explain whether the work is an original production, a licensed adaptation, or an existing release being distributed through another entry point. Those are different relationships and should not be collapsed into one authorship claim.
For a first conversation, send a short description, a playable link or build overview, the devices you target, and the publishing help you need. Describe the rights you hold to the code, artwork, audio and other included assets. Do not email account credentials or private signing keys as part of an introduction.
2. Separate the content build from platform integration
A browser package and a native mini-game package are separate delivery targets. A successful browser test does not establish that a mini-game package has passed the destination platform’s review or device requirements. Platform configuration, account services, analytics, advertising and purchases need their own integration checks where those features are used.
The technical SDK guide describes the current integration path and upload requirements. Those requirements can change as the service evolves, so developers should use that guide rather than treat a general company page as a complete specification. Internal packaging or review status is not the same as approval by a third-party distribution platform.
3. Review the experience around the first interaction
A release check should begin at the public link a player will actually use, not at a developer’s cached local preview. Open that link, wait for the first playable screen, verify the instructions, and perform a real input action. Check sound after an intentional interaction and confirm that the layout still works at the intended orientation and screen size.
Record the browser, device, version and entry URL with the observation. A loading screen is evidence that part of a package was delivered; it is not by itself evidence that a complete play session works. When an issue is fixed, repeat the action that originally failed instead of relying only on a successful build command.
4. Treat a catalog entry and a game update separately
The shared DelionPlay catalog can link an existing game through a platform player while the original game host continues to serve its files. In that arrangement, improving the toolbar or changing a catalog cover does not automatically change the game’s code, SDK, save system or platform account behaviour.
This distinction is important for both partners and players. A new catalog address should not be advertised as a new content release unless the underlying content actually changed. The support guides explain why a direct game tab and an embedded player can also encounter different browser storage behaviour.
5. Publish clear information and keep a route back
Players need an accurate title, a representative image, a usable entry link, and understandable controls. Partners need to know which content version is being delivered and which integration or platform checks remain open. Release notes should describe observed changes and known limits, rather than use a generic claim that every browser or device is supported.
After release, a reproducible report is more useful than a screenshot without context. Keep the entry address and version information with an issue, distinguish a content change from a hosting change, and verify the public route after a correction. Our player support page is a public route for these reports.
Start with the right material.
For partnerships, contact business@delionplay.com with your playable link, rights and platform overview. For implementation details, read the SDK guide. For a problem in a live title, use player support.
Our company is AI-native in how it researches and operates. AI assistance does not establish asset ownership, replace a play test, or turn every distributed title into an original DelionPlay production.